Loading...
Guidelines governing the ethical deployment, practical boundaries, and transparency parameters of AI-assisted systems within Dr. Olasunkanmi Arowolo's workflows.
I view artificial intelligence as a tool for augmentation rather than replacement. AI can support research, learning, creativity, analysis, and productivity, but it does not replace critical thinking, subject expertise, professional judgement, or human responsibility.
In my work, AI may be used to assist with idea generation, brainstorming, language refinement, coding support, administrative tasks, data exploration, and the organisation of information.
All substantive decisions, interpretations, conclusions, and published outputs remain subject to rigorous human review, verification, and absolute personal accountability.
I do not regard AI-generated content as inherently accurate, authoritative, or unbiased. Information produced by generative models is critically evaluated, systematically fact-checked, and assessed against relevant evidence, sources, and professional standards.
As an educator, researcher, consultant, and digital practitioner, I advocate for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of AI. This includes recognizing its opportunities while remaining attentive to its limitations, risks, biases, privacy implications, and broader societal impact.
I use voice-to-text to record my reflections for efficiency and have AI transcribe and proofread it while preserving my original voice. I explicitly instruct the AI to avoid AI transitional words and keep my authentic voice as captured through voice-to-text.
Our Guiding Principle
"Technology should enhance human capability, not diminish human responsibility."
Loading...
